Hmm... probably it was too early to apply this? I was just going
to prepare v2, based on discussion...
Which discussion?
One you are replying in?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/136
Also, applying only 11/21, without 01/21, will just cause build errors ...
CC'ing me on this patch alone when you know you have build
dependencies on other patches in the set is a bad idea. Failing to
mention that you wanted the patch to be handled in a special and/or
unconventional way is an even worse idea.
How are you expecting this patch(-set) to be handled?
Sorry but I did not CC you this patch.
I sent entire patchset to mailing lists and to maintainers of IRQ and
device tree subsystems.
I used git send-email, and all mails went out to the same recipients.
Recipient addresses extracted using scripts/get_maintainer.pl applied to
the "main" patch of the patchset.
I did not sent entire patchset to maintainers of individual changed
drivers because this makes recipient address too big and too much looks
like spamming.
I did not send individual patches to individual addresses to avoid cases
of partially-applied patchset that will just break things (actually this
is what happened with 11/21)
I'm quite sorry if I did things wrong, it was my first attempt to sent
patchset with tree-wide fixes. However, I don't see what I've done
wrong... any hints on that will be appreciated.
Nikita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
