On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 12:10 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:36:39PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:25 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Driver requires different amount of clocks for different SoCs. Describe > > > these requirements properly to fix dtbs_check warnings like: > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-beacon-kit.dt.yaml: nand-controller@33002000: clock-names:1: 'gpmi_apb' was expected > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > 1. Do not require order of clocks (use pattern). > > > > To the extent that you can, you should fix the order in dts files > > first. If we just adjust the schemas to match the dts files, then > > what's the point? > > The DTSes do not have mixed order of clocks between each other, as fair > as I remember. It was fix after Sasha Hauer comment that order is not > necessarily good. > > We have the clock-names property, why enforcing the order? Because DT/OpenFirmware has always had a defined order for property values. '*-names' is just extra information. Rob
