On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:17:29AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > I found the reason, the three patches in v2 were applied to for-next tree. > Should I renew patches based on for-next? Since the "mps,switch-frequency" > binding isn't released and used, I think I can send new patches to convert > mps,switch-frequency to mps,switch-frequency-hz. Yes, please - for-next is best for anything that isn't a bug fix.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
