On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 22:05:13 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 05:10:51PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > Implement the .set_ramp_delay for MP8867 and MP8869. MP8867 and MP8869 > > could share the implementation, the only difference is the slew_rates > > array. > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. I found the reason, the three patches in v2 were applied to for-next tree. Should I renew patches based on for-next? Since the "mps,switch-frequency" binding isn't released and used, I think I can send new patches to convert mps,switch-frequency to mps,switch-frequency-hz. Thanks
