On 8/6/20 9:45 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
06.08.2020 19:41, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
...
What about to add 72us delay to the end of start_calibration() in order
to ensure that FSM is finished before LP-11?
Why we should add 72uS in start_calibration() when can use same
finish_calibration() for both pass/fail cases?
Only timing loose we see is in case of failure we still wait for 250ms
and as this is failing case I hope should be ok.
You said that calibration settings are applied to pads on LP-11, but if
LP-11 happens before FSM is finished, then what values will be applied
if any?
No calibration logic will check for LP-11 only after finishing
calibration sequence codes.
After that if it sees LP-11, it will apply results to pads and DONE bit
will then be set to 1 indication pad results update.
Unfortunately like I said we don't have status indication for
calibrating finished before waiting for LP-11.
ACTIVE bit is common for all PADS. If multiple 6 streams are happening
in parallel, ACTIVE will be 1 as long as its calibrating any of the pads
and its not for individual pads.