Hi all, On mié 27-05-2020 20:18:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > There's currently no requirement that binding schema don't introduce > > warnings in dts files. That should change when/if we get to a warning > > free state (probably per platform/family). I don't think we're close > > on any platform? (If we are, I'd like to start tracking that). It is > > good to pay attention to the warnings you get though as the schema may > > not be doing what you expect or the binding really doesn't match > > reality. > > OK. > > > > I do my best to avoid introducing regressions when the binding conversions > > > go upstream. > > > > Meaning you fix the dts files or massage the schema to match? If we > > just adjust schema to match, what's the point in this effort? We > > should find things wrong or ill defined. > > I fix up DTS files, and fast-track those fixes, so they appear upstream before > the DT binding conversion, where possible. Thank you everyone for pitching in and for clarifying the procedure, I'll prepare a new series with the changes that Laurent proposed (without the patches that Geert already merged). Cheers, Ricardo
