Hi Laurent, On jue 14-05-2020 18:22:39, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > If we want to be more strict and require the definition of all the > > supplies, there will be many more DTs changes in the series, and I'm not > > sure I'll be able to do that in a reasonable amount of time. I'm looking > > at them and it's not always clear which regulators to use or if they are > > even defined. > > We can decouple the two though (I think). The bindings should reflect > what we consider right, and the dts files could be fixed on top. Do you have a suggestion on how to do this? If we decouple the two tasks most of the work would be searching for DTs to fix and finding a way to fix each one of them, and unless I do this _before_ the binding conversion I'll get a lot of dtbs_check errors. The binding conversion itself is done, if we go this route the only additional change would be to make the supplies required. Cheers, Ricardo
