On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 02:59:26PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > I think there is a misunderstanding here. In this patch I am not enabling you are right, I've missed the fact, that this also needs to be enabled in TLB entries. Strange that MIPS added the enable bit while R10k simply do uncached acclerated, whenever TLB entry selects it. > If there is no misunderstanding and you said what you said, that even enabling > the feature for utilization might be dangerous, let's at least leave the > MIPS_CONF_MM, MIPS_CONF_MM_FULL and MIPS_CONF_MM_SYS_SYSAD fields > definition in the "arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h" header. I'll use > them to enable the write-merge in my platform code. > > What do you think? I withdraw my concerns and will apply the patch as is. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
