Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/5] IIO: Ingenic JZ47xx: Add touchscreen mode.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Le sam. 18 avril 2020 à 0:52, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:45 AM Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 Le sam. 18 avril 2020 à 0:42, Andy Shevchenko
 <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:18 AM Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 > wrote:
 >>  Le sam. 18 avril 2020 à 0:13, Andy Shevchenko
 >>  <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
 >>  > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:05 AM Paul Cercueil
 >> <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 >>  > wrote:
 >>  >>  Le ven. 17 avril 2020 à 23:59, Andy Shevchenko
 >>  >>  <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
 >>  >>  > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:21 PM Artur Rojek
 >>  >> <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 >>  >>  > wrote:
 >>  >
 >>  > ...
 >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  +       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
 >>  >>  >
>> >> > Before it worked w/o IRQ, here is a regression you introduced.
 >>  >>
>> >> Before it simply did not need the IRQ, which is provided by the
 >>  >>  devicetree anyway. No regression here.
 >>  >
 >>  > Does it work without IRQ? Or it was a dead code till now?
>> > For me it's clear regression. Otherwise something is really wrong
 >> in a
 >>  > process of development of this driver.
 >>
 >>  Nothing wrong here. The IRQ was not used by the driver for the
>> functionality it provided before. It is required now to support the
 >>  touchscreen channels.
 >
 > This is exactly what's wrong.
> Previous DTS for my (hypothetical) case has no IRQ defined. Everything
 > works, right?
> Now, due to this change it breaks my setup. Don't you see the problem?

 The IRQ has been provided by every concerned DTS file since the
 introduction of this driver and the related bindings, even though it
 was not used by the driver.

Can you speak for all possible DTSs/DTBs in the wild?
Okay, in any case it will be problem of maintainers and yours if
somebody complains.

I can, since I wrote all of them.

-Paul

I'm not going to push this anyway -- your choice.

But I see a (potential) regression.

 >>  >>  >>  +       if (irq < 0) {
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to get irq: %d\n",
 >> irq);
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  > Redundant message.
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  +               return irq;
 >>  >>  >>  +       }

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux