Will & Sudeep, > -----Original Message----- > From: Neil Zhang > Sent: 2014年5月5日 14:28 > To: Sudeep Holla; Will Deacon > Cc: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier > > Sudeep, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx] > > Sent: 2014年4月30日 21:31 > > To: Neil Zhang; Will Deacon > > Cc: Sudeep Holla; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm > > notifier > > > > Hi Neil, > > > > On 30/04/14 03:21, Neil Zhang wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@xxxxxxx] > > > > [...] > > > > >> > > >> I think we need some input from the device-tree guys to see whether > > >> they would object to us solving this locally (in the PMU node) or not. > > >> Personally, I'd much prefer a general way to describe the need for > > >> pm-notifiers, but if that's not being looked at then we can cook > > >> something specifically for our needs. > > >> > > > > > > No input from device-tree guys :( > > > > The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1] > > Thanks for the information. > But it currently for device only, core related stuff are not supported. > And is it really good to register power provider for core and let vfp / pmu etc > to get it? > What's your suggestion about it? Is it OK that I add it under the PMU node? > > > > Regards, > > Sudeep > > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/23/755 > > > Best Regards, > Neil Zhang Best Regards, Neil Zhang ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
