On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:16 AM Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 12/11/19 8:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:00 AM Benjamin Gaignard > > <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> Typical pwm nodes should be named pwm@xxx. > >> The pattern shouldn't match nodes named pwm-xxx to avoid > >> conflicts with pinmux or pwm-fan nodes. > > It only matches pwm-$(a-hex-number), not any string, so that shouldn't > > be a problem. This is needed for things like GPIO based devices (not > > just PWMs) which don't have any address. > > > > Pinmux nodes are going to need to adopt some sort of standard pattern > > we can match on. > I have push a patch to stop using '@' and '_' in pinmux groups names: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1162591/ > It remove the warnings when compiling the devicetre with W=12 but pwm.yaml > complain because pwm pinmux is named pwm-1. > > How can I solve these issues at the same time ? Name the nodes *-pins or *-pins-[0-9]. You're probably going to need some pattern anyways when you do a pinmux schema. Rob
