On 12/12/19 8:07 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:16 AM Benjamin GAIGNARD > <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 12/11/19 8:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:00 AM Benjamin Gaignard >>> <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Typical pwm nodes should be named pwm@xxx. >>>> The pattern shouldn't match nodes named pwm-xxx to avoid >>>> conflicts with pinmux or pwm-fan nodes. >>> It only matches pwm-$(a-hex-number), not any string, so that shouldn't >>> be a problem. This is needed for things like GPIO based devices (not >>> just PWMs) which don't have any address. >>> >>> Pinmux nodes are going to need to adopt some sort of standard pattern >>> we can match on. >> I have push a patch to stop using '@' and '_' in pinmux groups names: >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1162591/ >> It remove the warnings when compiling the devicetre with W=12 but pwm.yaml >> complain because pwm pinmux is named pwm-1. >> >> How can I solve these issues at the same time ? > Name the nodes *-pins or *-pins-[0-9]. You're probably going to need > some pattern anyways when you do a pinmux schema. + Alex because that impact pin node pattern in st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml Benjamin > Rob
