Hi Baruch,
On Wed Nov 20, 2019 at 6:50 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Stephen, Stefan,
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20 2019, Stephen Brennan wrote:
>
>
> > From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > The BCM2711 has a RNG200 block, so document its compatible string.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Isn't that duplicate of Florian's commit 6223949a1531?
>
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> > index c223e54452da..802523196ee5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ HWRNG support for the iproc-rng200 driver
> >
> > Required properties:
> > - compatible : Must be one of:
> > + "brcm,bcm2711-rng200"
> > "brcm,bcm7211-rng200"
>
>
> Isn't this clear text duplication? Am I missing something obvious?
>
I understand the confusion, but they're different, we're looking at the
difference between:
bcm2711
bcm7211
^^
These are apparently separate but related chips, leading to confusion in
other places [1] as well. I double checked the commit 6223949a1531 you
pointed out, as well as 1fa6d053b2a5 from your other email, to verify that
this is the case. No duplication (as far as I can tell) is in the series.
[1]: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3163
Regards,
Stephen
>
> I was looking at versions of this patch series wondering why no one
> noticed that.
>
>
> baruch
>
>
> > "brcm,bcm7278-rng200"
> > "brcm,iproc-rng200"
>
>
> --
> http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
> =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
> - baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
>
>
>
>
