Hi Stephen, Stefan,
On Wed, Nov 20 2019, Stephen Brennan wrote:
> From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
>
> The BCM2711 has a RNG200 block, so document its compatible string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Isn't that duplicate of Florian's commit 6223949a1531?
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> index c223e54452da..802523196ee5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ HWRNG support for the iproc-rng200 driver
>
> Required properties:
> - compatible : Must be one of:
> + "brcm,bcm2711-rng200"
> "brcm,bcm7211-rng200"
Isn't this clear text duplication? Am I missing something obvious?
I was looking at versions of this patch series wondering why no one
noticed that.
baruch
> "brcm,bcm7278-rng200"
> "brcm,iproc-rng200"
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
