Hello,
On 7/24/19 2:06 PM, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> Rework the device trees of the OPOS6UL and OPOS6ULDev boards to support
> the OPOS6UL SoM with an i.MX6ULL SoC. The device trees are now as
> following:
>
> - imx6ul-imx6ull-opos6ul.dtsi
> common for both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL OPOS6UL SoM.
> - imx6ul-opos6ul.dtsi
> for i.MX6UL OPOS6UL SoM. It includes imx6ul.dtsi and
> imx6ul-imx6ull-opos6ul.dtsi.
> - imx6ull-opos6ul.dtsi
> for i.MX6ULL OPOS6UL SoM. It includes imx6ull.dtsi and
> imx6ul-imx6ull-opos6ul.dtsi.
>
> - imx6ul-imx6ull-opos6uldev.dtsi
> OPOS6ULDev base device tree.
> - imx6ul-opos6uldev.dts
> OPOS6ULDev board with an i.MX6UL OPOS6UL SoM. It includes
> imx6ul-opos6ul.dtsi and imx6ul-imx6ull-opos6uldevdtsi.
> - imx6ull-opos6uldev.dts
> OPOS6ULDev board with an i.MX6ULL OPOS6UL SoM. It includes
> imx6ull-opos6ul.dtsi and imx6ul-imx6ull-opos6uldevdtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes for v2:
> - explain the file hierarchy in the commit log
> - use MIT license instead of X11
> - Change compatible properties to "armadeus,imx6{ul,ull}-opos6ul" and
> "armadeus,imx6{ul,ull}-opos6uldev" to follow the bindings of the
> Armadeus boards already supported.
gentle ping...
Regards,
Sébastien
