On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:19:35 +0200
Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For today the reattach function only update the device address on the
> controller.
>
> Update the location to the first available too, will optimize the
> enumeration process avoiding additional checks to keep the available
> positions on address table consecutive.
Given the number of available slots I honestly don't think it makes a
difference, but I also don't mind this change, so
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> index 1d83c97..62261ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> @@ -898,6 +898,22 @@ static int dw_i3c_master_reattach_i3c_dev(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev,
> struct dw_i3c_i2c_dev_data *data = i3c_dev_get_master_data(dev);
> struct i3c_master_controller *m = i3c_dev_get_master(dev);
> struct dw_i3c_master *master = to_dw_i3c_master(m);
> + int pos;
> +
> + pos = dw_i3c_master_get_free_pos(master);
> +
> + if (data->index > pos && pos > 0) {
> + writel(0,
> + master->regs +
> + DEV_ADDR_TABLE_LOC(master->datstartaddr, data->index));
> +
> + master->addrs[data->index] = 0;
> + master->free_pos |= BIT(data->index);
> +
> + data->index = pos;
> + master->addrs[pos] = dev->info.dyn_addr;
> + master->free_pos &= ~BIT(pos);
> + }
>
> writel(DEV_ADDR_TABLE_DYNAMIC_ADDR(dev->info.dyn_addr),
> master->regs +
