RE: [PATCH 05/14] serial: tegra: flush the RX fifo on frame error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 3:19 PM
> To: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Laxman
> Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>; jslaby@xxxxxxxx; linux-
> serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shardar Mohammed
> <smohammed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] serial: tegra: flush the RX fifo on frame error
> 
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:58:14PM +0530, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> > From: Shardar Shariff Md <smohammed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > FIFO reset/flush code implemented now does not follow programming
> > guidelines. RTS line has to be turned off while flushing fifos to
> > avoid new transfers. Also check LSR bits UART_LSR_TEMT and
> UART_LSR_DR
> > to confirm fifos are flushed.
> 
> You use inconsistent spelling for FIFO here.
Will fix in next version and take care of this in all patches

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Shardar Shariff Md <smohammed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> > index ae7225c..f6a3f4e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> > @@ -266,6 +266,10 @@ static void tegra_uart_wait_sym_time(struct
> > tegra_uart_port *tup,  static void tegra_uart_fifo_reset(struct
> > tegra_uart_port *tup, u8 fcr_bits)  {
> >  	unsigned long fcr = tup->fcr_shadow;
> > +	unsigned int lsr, tmout = 10000;
> > +
> > +	if (tup->rts_active)
> > +		set_rts(tup, false);
> >
> >  	if (tup->cdata->allow_txfifo_reset_fifo_mode) {
> >  		fcr |= fcr_bits & (UART_FCR_CLEAR_RCVR |
> UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT); @@
> > -289,6 +293,17 @@ static void tegra_uart_fifo_reset(struct tegra_uart_port
> *tup, u8 fcr_bits)
> >  	 * to propagate, otherwise data could be lost.
> >  	 */
> >  	tegra_uart_wait_cycle_time(tup, 32);
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		lsr = tegra_uart_read(tup, UART_LSR);
> > +		if (lsr | UART_LSR_TEMT)
> > +			if (!(lsr & UART_LSR_DR))
> 
> Can't both of these go on the same line?
> 
> Thierry
> 
They can be. Will fix in next version
KY

> > +				break;
> > +		udelay(1);
> > +	} while (--tmout);
> > +
> > +	if (tup->rts_active)
> > +		set_rts(tup, true);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int tegra_set_baudrate(struct tegra_uart_port *tup, unsigned
> > int baud)
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux