On Mon 19 Aug 00:39 PDT 2019, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Convert the rpmh clock driver to use the new parent data scheme by
> specifying the parent data for board clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index c3fd632af119..16d689e5bb3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmh_clk_lock);
> .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \
> .ops = &clk_rpmh_ops, \
> .name = #_name, \
> - .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo_board" }, \
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){ \
> + .fw_name = "xo", \
> + .name = "xo", \
Shouldn't .name be "xo_board" to retain backwards compatibility?
Regards,
Bjorn
> + }, \
> .num_parents = 1, \
> }, \
> }; \
> @@ -110,7 +113,10 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmh_clk_lock);
> .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \
> .ops = &clk_rpmh_ops, \
> .name = #_name_active, \
> - .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo_board" }, \
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){ \
> + .fw_name = "xo", \
> + .name = "xo", \
> + }, \
> .num_parents = 1, \
> }, \
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
