On 19-08-19, 22:08, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 19 Aug 00:39 PDT 2019, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > Convert the rpmh clock driver to use the new parent data scheme by
> > specifying the parent data for board clock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > index c3fd632af119..16d689e5bb3c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > @@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmh_clk_lock);
> > .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \
> > .ops = &clk_rpmh_ops, \
> > .name = #_name, \
> > - .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo_board" }, \
> > + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){ \
> > + .fw_name = "xo", \
> > + .name = "xo", \
>
> Shouldn't .name be "xo_board" to retain backwards compatibility?
Yes I have updated that
Thanks
--
~Vinod
