Hi Rob, On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:34 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:35 PM Martin Blumenstingl > <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Add the bindings for the PCIe PHY on Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 SoCs. > > The IP block contains settings for the PHY and a PLL. > > The PLL mode is configurable through a dedicated #phy-cell in .dts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml | 87 +++++++++++++++++++ > > .../dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h | 11 +++ > > 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..b7b222e772d0 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > The preference is (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) for new bindings. to make sure I understand this correctly: the license is then only valid for the bindings - is it fine if the driver uses GPL-2.0-only? I don't have any datasheet for these SoCs so all my knowledge is based on the GPL-2.0-only driver from the Lantiq board support package (called "UGW"). the .yaml file is 100% my own work so I'm fine with having GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause however, that still has to be compatible with my driver, which I chose to be GPL-2.0-only because that's the license from the Lantiq board support package Martin
