On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:22:43PM -0700, Loc Ho wrote: > I was modeled after driver rtc-coh901331.c. It seems like all I need > here is to call clk_disable_unprepare() instead clk_disable for > suspend. For resume, call clk_prepare_disable() instead clk_enable(). > No need to split them up. Am I correct? Yes, the only reason the two operations are split is to support enabling and disabling in interrupt context but you're not doing that. > Given that Andrew Morton applied v2, should I post an patch against v2 > going forward? Yes, once something has been applied you should only be sending incremental patches.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
