On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:49:57AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> I agree with you that we can use shorter name. I have checked this
> with Punnaiah and I can't see any problem to have more edac drivers
> in the system. For zynq there is primary ddr controller which is
> target by this driver. Then we are talking about L2 in another thread.
> Because zynq has programmable logic next to chip where you can add
> soft memory controller (we have these hw designs) on the same bus then
> there could be others edac drivers. I would say how many you like till
> pins on the package.
I knew you were gonna say something like that! :-)
Then you'll have to check whether edac can even stomach more than one
drivers in parallel. TTBOMK, no one has ever done this so far... Yadda
yadda.
But before you do all that, you need to check whether edac is really
what you're looking for, as I put it in my other mail.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
