On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:01:36AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Just add it to Zynq maintainer fragment as we are doing for non
> zynq/xilinx drivers.
Yep, as a file pattern F:
> At least the is the first time when someone saying that only some
> functions should be documented.
I don't see the need to document simple functions which are *obvious*.
But if you want to do that, I'm not going to stop you so be my guest.
> I don't think this is good to do. When we remove this prefix entirely
> it is bigger chance that the same function name will be used by
> another driver. It is not a problem with linking but the same
> functions names will be listed in System.map which will complicate
> debugging.
Ok, fair enough. You probably still want to make them shorter, though,
so that your code doesn't have to be line-broken too much. For example,
since we only load a single edac driver per system, you can shorten the
prefix to "edac_" only.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
