Hi! On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:10:12AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > > Device-tree BSP and in 2014.01 there will be new BSP which just > > generate them directly from the Vivado tools which just target your > > reference design. You can connect your custom IP (or Xilinx or 3rd > > party) directly to the GIC which using different IRQ sensitivity > > with whatever register addresses and make no sense to write it by > > hand. > > On our Zynq design here we ended up being unwilling to use platform > generation from Vivado. Basically all our IP was custom, so there was > no win at all to invoking the complexity of the automatic tools. > > Thus we write the DT by hand, and our DT is complex, integrating > peripherals that span two FPGAs. > > I think the in-kernel DT should use the kernel conventions, which > means using #include and the binding constants over magic values. > ACK. If in doubt follow common mainline practice. Although using includes for DT is not necessarily common practice, readability of DTs is really important IMHO. Regards, Steffen -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
