Hi guys, I've noticed gpio_wdt was added to the kernel to support some devices based on devicetree. We used to have our own (not mainlined) gpio_wdt in OpenWrt project: http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/990-gpio_wdt.patch;hb=HEAD The main difference is that the mainlined one uses OF, while OpenWrt's one uses plain platform API (with struct gpio_wdt_platform_data). I wanted to bring a topic of mainlining OpenWrt's solution. We definitely need that and at the same time our device(s) don't use OF / DT. Do you think we should extend wdt-gpio to handle that? Or do you think this driver is so small, it's not worth it and we should submit a separated one? Apart from API being used, one other difference I see is OpenWrt supports different values for "first tick" and "interval". But that could be easily handled. -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
