On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:04:16 +0100 Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > The GTA04 has a w2sg0004 or w2sg0084 gps chip. Not detectable > > which one is mounted so use the compatibility entry for w2sg0004 > > for all which will work for both. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v3: > > - converted to a patchset > > - added vcc-supply > > > > Changes in v2: > > - some s/gps/gnss/ > > - not added vcc-supply because the regulator is not modelled > > in dts at all > > > > w2sg0004 bindings are in next-20190129 > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi > > index 02d8274a2f47..4ea0f7dc37c6 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi > > @@ -320,6 +320,12 @@ > > >; > > }; > > > > + gps_pins: pinmux_gps_pins { > > s/gps/gnss/ would be more consistent, but whatever. > well, gps is already in the file at another place. So it is a bit inconsistent in any case, without further cleanup. If someone comes up with a strong opinion here I would of course change it. Regards, Andreas
Attachment:
pgpciccVz4CJw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature