Re: [PATCH v5 11/20] iommu/mediatek: Move vld_pa_rng into plat_data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 11:58 AM Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Both mt8173 and mt8183 don't have this vld_pa_rng(valid physical address
> range) register while mt2712 have. Move it into the plat_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 3 ++-
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 8d8ab21..2913ddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
>                          upper_32_bits(data->protect_base);
>         writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
>
> -       if (data->enable_4GB && data->plat_data->m4u_plat != M4U_MT8173) {
> +       if (data->enable_4GB && data->plat_data->vld_pa_rng) {
>                 /*
>                  * If 4GB mode is enabled, the validate PA range is from
>                  * 0x1_0000_0000 to 0x1_ffff_ffff. here record bit[32:30].
> @@ -741,6 +741,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_resume(struct device *dev)
>         .m4u_plat     = M4U_MT2712,
>         .has_4gb_mode = true,
>         .has_bclk     = true,
> +       .vld_pa_rng   = true,
>         .larbid_remap = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9},
>  };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> index b46aeaa..a8c5d1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct mtk_iommu_plat_data {
>         /* HW will use the EMI clock if there isn't the "bclk". */
>         bool                has_bclk;
>         bool                reset_axi;
> +       bool                vld_pa_rng;

Since this is not a register name, maybe we can use something more
readable, like valid_pa_range?

(or at the very least describe it in a comment in the struct?)

>         unsigned char       larbid_remap[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX];
>  };
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux