On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +0300, Maksym Kokhan wrote: > Do you mean, that you haven't seen patch for ARM, which I sent on > September 27 along with cover and patch 1? It is strange, because > you was the one from recipients. If so, you can see this patch here: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/992779/ It seems that I have received patch 5, _but_ it's not threaded with the cover message and patch 1. With 50k messages in my inbox, and 3k messages since you sent the series, it's virtually impossible to find it (I only found it by looking at my mail server logs from September to find the subject, and then searching my mailbox for that subject.) This is unnecessarily difficult. > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:48 PM Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 05:43:18PM +0300, Maksym Kokhan wrote: > > > We still have no response to patches for x86, arm, arm64 and powerpc. > > > Is current generic command line implementation appropriate for these > > > architectures? > > > Is it possible to merge these patches in the current form (for x86, > > > arm, arm64 and powerpc)? > > > > You may wish to consider your recipients - I seem to only have received > > the cover and patch 1 (which doesn't include any ARM specific bits). > > It may be that you're not getting responses because people haven't seen > > your patches. > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up > > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
