On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:39:04PM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 10:56 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:39:12AM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 12:45 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:59:54AM +0800, honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > + /* Set up class code for MT7622 */
> > > > > + val = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 16;
> > > > > + writel(val, port->base + PCIE_CONF_CLASS);
> > > >
> > > > 1) Your comments mention MT7622 specifically, but this code is run for
> > > > both mt2712-pcie and mt7622-pcie. If this code is safe and necessary
> > > > for both mt2712-pcie and mt7622-pcie, please remove the mention of
> > > > MT7622.
> > >
> > > Hmm, the code snippet added here will only be executed by MT7622, since
> > > MT2712 will not enter this "if (pcie->base) {" condition.
> > > Should the mention of MT7622 must be removed in this case?
> >
> > You should add an explicit way (eg of_device_is_compatible() match for
> > instance) to apply the quirk just on the platform that requires it.
> >
> > Checking for "if (pcie->base)" is really not the way to do it.
> >
>
> hi, Lorenzo,
> Thanks very much for your advise.
> Passing the compatible string or platform data into this function needed
> to add some new field in the struct mtk_pcie_port, then I guess both set
> it for MT2712 and MT7622 is an easy way, since re-setting those values
> for MT2712 is safe.
>
> > > > 2) The first comment mentions both "vendor ID and device ID" but you
> > > > don't write the device ID. Since this code applies to both
> > > > mt2712-pcie and mt7622-pcie, my guess is that you don't *want* to
> > > > write the device ID. If that's the case, please fix the comment.
> > > >
> > >
> > > My bad, I did not check the comments carefully.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > > 3) If you only need to set the vendor ID, you're performing a 32-bit
> > > > write (writel()) to update a 16-bit value. Please use writew()
> > > > instead.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ok, thanks, I guess I could use the following code snippet in the next
> > > version:
> > > val = readl(port->base + PCIE_CONF_VENDOR_ID)
> > > val &= ~GENMASK(15, 0);
> > > val |= PCI_VENDOR_ID_MEDIATEK;
> > > writel(val, port->base + PCIE_CONF_VENDOR_ID);
> >
> > Have you read Bjorn's comment ? Or there is a problem with using
> > a writew() ?
> >
>
> This control register is a 32bit register, I'm not sure whether the apb
> bus support write an 16bit value with 16bit but not 32bit address
> alignment. I prefer the more safety old way of writel.
>
> I need to do more test about the writew if the code elegant is more
> important.
I will mark this patch as "Changes Requested" waiting for a new
version, thanks.
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
