On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Mark Rutland wrote: > To me it feels odd to require the last clock in the list (apb_pclk) to > be named, and the rest to be in a particular order. For the dt case it > seems saner to add new clocks with names as it allows arbitrary subsets > of clocks to be wired up and described (though obviously in this case a > missing sspclk would be problematic). Yes, good point about the missing clocks, and I also agree mixing ordered and named clocks in one device is rather odd and can lead to trouble. I guess there isn't really a good way out here, and I certainly won't ask for it to be done one way or the other if someone else has a good argument which way it should be implemented. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
