On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:37:09AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > - pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL); > > + /* > > + * For compatibility with old DTBs and platform data, fall back to the > > + * first clock if there's not an explicitly named "sspclk" entry. > > + */ > > + pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, "sspclk"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pl022->clk)) > > + pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL); > > + > > I'll just have a bit of a grumble here and point out that this sort of > stuff always worries me with the convention of using nameless clocks - > it causes hassle adding further clocks. I think the best solution for this is to continue with anonymous clocks rather than adding names after the fact. This could be done (for DT-only drivers) using the of_clk_get() interface that takes an index, or we could add a generic dev_clk_get_index() or similar interface that has the same behavior but also works for clkdev. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
