On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:33:29AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > For new bindings I'd really like to push people to always use named > clocks as it makes things far more flexible, but I appreciate that here > there are issues associated with modifying an existing binding. > Mark, do you have specific issues that named clocks cause that I could > look into? None, I actively prefer naming them (though Russell's point about people picking names poorly pre-DT does make it clear why it makes sense that we weren't doing that). I was just grumbling about the fact that transitioning from unnamed to named is a bit ugly.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
