On 12-02-18, 09:39, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 12/02/2018 07:10, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 09-02-18, 13:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> Putting apart the device binding changes discussion for the moment. Why > >> not register the cpufreq driver in all the cases and then drop > > > > s/cpufreq driver/cpufreq cooling driver/ ?? > > yes. > > >> cooling-cells ? So when the opps are present, its registers in the > >> cpufreq->ready callback. > > > > How will someone tell if they don't need the cooling infrastructure ? > > Specially for multiplatform thing. > > They don't define a cooling device in the DT ? Sorry but I am getting a bit confused on what you are suggesting. Maybe you need to rephrase it once more for me, from the very beginning :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
