>From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam@xxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2017 00:08 >Hi Patrick, > Hi Fabio, >On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Patrick Brünn <P.Bruenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >wrote: > >>>rtc@... >>> >> The rtc for which this series adds support is embedded within a function >block called >> "Secure Real Time Clock". This driver doesn't utilize all of the hardware >features by >> now. But maybe someone else wants to extend the functionalities, later. >> For that possibility I wanted to name the node "srtc". Should I still change >this? >> >> I believe you have a much better understanding of what should be done >here. I don't >> want to argue with you, just thought you might not had that information. So >if I am >> wrong just tell me and I will change it without further "complaining". > >From the Devicetree Specification document: > >"Generic Names Recommendation > >The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function >of the device and not its precise program- >ming model. If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices: >... >rtc >" > >So better use 'rtc' as suggested by Rob. Thanks for this clarification. I will wait a few days for more comments on the rest of the driver and then send a v4. Regards, Patrick Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG | Managing Director: Dipl. Phys. Hans Beckhoff Registered office: Verl, Germany | Register court: Guetersloh HRA 7075 ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
