Hi Patrick, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Patrick Brünn <P.Bruenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>rtc@... >> > The rtc for which this series adds support is embedded within a function block called > "Secure Real Time Clock". This driver doesn't utilize all of the hardware features by > now. But maybe someone else wants to extend the functionalities, later. > For that possibility I wanted to name the node "srtc". Should I still change this? > > I believe you have a much better understanding of what should be done here. I don't > want to argue with you, just thought you might not had that information. So if I am > wrong just tell me and I will change it without further "complaining". >From the Devicetree Specification document: "Generic Names Recommendation The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise program- ming model. If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices: ... rtc " So better use 'rtc' as suggested by Rob. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
