On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 05:08:32PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > What using of_match_ptr() should do is allow the compiler to figure out > > that the table isn't used when DT is disabled and discard it without > > ifdefs. Not sure if that actually works yet but that's the idea. > Right, but I'm guessing that as there is no support for platform data > then this device(s) is going to be DT only? If that's the case perhaps > a 'depends OF' might be in order. If that's not the case then I'm more > than happy to leave the of_match_ptr() in. Hey, we'll all be using ACPI soon! :P
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
