> Add a driver for the BCM59056 PMU multi-function device. The driver
> initially supports regmap initialization and instantiation of the
> voltage regulator device function of the PMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 8 +++
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/mfd/bcm59056.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/bcm59056.h | 35 +++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 163 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/bcm59056.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/bcm59056.h
<snip>
> +static struct mfd_cell bcm59056s[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "bcm59056-pmu",
If you plan to use *->of_node in the PMU driver, which it looks like
you do, you should set the compatible string here.
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config bcm59056_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> + .max_register = BCM59056_MAX_REGISTER - 1,
If you've just set this manually i.e. it's not part of an enum table,
can't you set it a value you don't need to do math on? It's not used
anywhere else is it?
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> +};
> +
> +static int bcm59056_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct bcm59056 *bcm59056;
> + int chip_id = id->driver_data;
I thought this was a DT only driver? If so, you probably want to use
of_match_device() instead.
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + bcm59056 = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(*bcm59056), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!bcm59056)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, bcm59056);
> + bcm59056->dev = &i2c->dev;
> + bcm59056->i2c_client = i2c;
> + bcm59056->id = chip_id;
> +
> + bcm59056->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &bcm59056_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(bcm59056->regmap)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(bcm59056->regmap);
> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "regmap initialization failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = mfd_add_devices(bcm59056->dev, -1,
> + bcm59056s, ARRAY_SIZE(bcm59056s),
> + NULL, 0, NULL);
Are you sure you need all of your #includes?
I notice that irqdomain is there, but you don't actually have one?
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "mfd_add_devices failed: %d\n", ret);
What if we change the name of the function? Probably better to say
something like "device registration failed" or thelike.
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int bcm59056_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
> +{
> + struct bcm59056 *bcm59056 = i2c_get_clientdata(i2c);
> +
> + mfd_remove_devices(bcm59056->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id bcm59056_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm59056", .data = (void *)BCM59056 },
You've gone to the trouble of setting a device version here, but you
don't seem to use it?
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id bcm59056_i2c_id[] = {
> + { "bcm59056", BCM59056 },
> + { }
> +};
Ah, I guess this is where id->driver comes from.
It's pretty silly that the I2C subsystem demands the presence of this
table, despite not using it if an of_device_id table is present.
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, bcm59056_i2c_id);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver bcm59056_i2c_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "bcm59056",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(bcm59056_of_match),
No need to use of_match_ptr() here.
> + },
> + .probe = bcm59056_i2c_probe,
> + .remove = bcm59056_i2c_remove,
> + .id_table = bcm59056_i2c_id,
*grumble*
> +};
> +
> +static int __init bcm59056_init(void)
> +{
> + return i2c_add_driver(&bcm59056_i2c_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(bcm59056_init);
Really? :(
Maybe you'll want to comment this, in case people do not know the back
ground and attempts to clean it up.
> +static void __exit bcm59056_exit(void)
> +{
> + i2c_del_driver(&bcm59056_i2c_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(bcm59056_exit);
<snip>
> +/* chip id */
> +#define BCM59056 0
Lonely, oh so lonely!
> +/* max register address */
> +#define BCM59056_MAX_REGISTER 0xe8
Don't you have a table of registers which you care about?
> +/* bcm59056 chip access */
Superfluous comment? Don't we all know what these containers do?
> +struct bcm59056 {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct i2c_client *i2c_client;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + unsigned int id;
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* __LINUX_MFD_BCM59056_H */
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
