On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 12:27:33AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> The Bananapi-M64 has 3 LEDS in red, green, and blue. These are toggled >> via GPIO lines, which drive transistors that control current across the >> LEDS. The red LED is by default on, via an additional pull-up on the >> control line. We consider this means that it is a power indicator. >> So we set the "default-on" property for it. >> >> The pingroups the GPIO lines belong to require external regulators be >> enabled to be able to drive the GPIO high. These regulators also have >> other purposes. However the pin controller does not have bindings for >> regulators. Here we just set them to always-on. > > I guess we should take the opportunity to do just that. > > We have been deferring this for quite some time now, this is a perfect > occasion to do it once and for all :) True. But right now I don't see an elegant solution. What is the purpose of having the regulator tied to pinctrl / GPIO? You can't have the pinctrl driver asking for the regulator at probe time, as it might not be available or even have a cyclic dependency (because the PMIC is I2C driven, which needs an I2C controller, which needs the pinctrl). If you defer fetching the regulator to a later point, you might end up with an inconsistent state. Again with the I2C driven regulator example, what happens if the regulator core decides to turn the regulator off before the pinctrl side has a chance to take a reference and enable it? Regards ChenYu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html