On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:41:58PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 29-01-2014 10:22, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> >>[snip]
>
> >>>>+static struct of_device_id rcar_gen2_usb_phy_ofmatch[] = {
> >>>>+ { .compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790", },
> >>>>+ { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-usb-phy", },
>
> >>> Frankly speaking, I don't understand the need for the clearly
> >>>duplicate entries.
>
> >>Thanks, will look into remove it.
> >>Anyone else have any comments on this?
>
> >I would like you to leave it there.
>
> >As we know the r8a7790 is an R-Car Gen2 SoC. But there are other R-Car
> >Gen2 SoCs, such as the r8a7791, they it could plausibly make use of
> >rcar-gen2-usb-phy until the driver is updated with a usb-phy-r8a7791 entry.
>
> Why not just "update" the driver this way now, may I ask?
Because I don't believe that Ben has access to r8a7791 hardware
to test the change and thus it makes sense to handle it separately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
