On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Dave Stevenson wrote: > Hi Stefan > > On 22 September 2017 at 07:45, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > >> Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> hat am 20. September 2017 um 18:07 geschrieben: > >> > >> > >> Document the DT bindings for the CSI2/CCP2 receiver peripheral > >> (known as Unicam) on BCM283x SoCs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> Changes since v2 > >> - Removed all references to Linux drivers. > >> - Reworded section about disabling the firmware driver. > >> - Renamed clock from "lp_clock" to "lp" in description and example. > >> - Referred to video-interfaces.txt and stated requirements on remote-endpoint > >> and data-lanes. > >> - Corrected typo in example from csi to csi1. > >> - Removed unnecessary #address-cells and #size-cells in example. > >> - Removed setting of status from the example. > >> > >> .../devicetree/bindings/media/bcm2835-unicam.txt | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/bcm2835-unicam.txt > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/bcm2835-unicam.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/bcm2835-unicam.txt > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..7714fb3 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/bcm2835-unicam.txt > >> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ > >> +Broadcom BCM283x Camera Interface (Unicam) > >> +------------------------------------------ > >> + > >> +The Unicam block on BCM283x SoCs is the receiver for either > >> +CSI-2 or CCP2 data from image sensors or similar devices. > >> + > >> +The main platform using this SoC is the Raspberry Pi family of boards. > >> +On the Pi the VideoCore firmware can also control this hardware block, > >> +and driving it from two different processors will cause issues. > >> +To avoid this, the firmware checks the device tree configuration > >> +during boot. If it finds device tree nodes called csi0 or csi1 then > >> +it will stop the firmware accessing the block, and it can then > >> +safely be used via the device tree binding. > >> + > >> +Required properties: > >> +=================== > >> +- compatible : must be "brcm,bcm2835-unicam". > >> +- reg : physical base address and length of the register sets for the > >> + device. > >> +- interrupts : should contain the IRQ line for this Unicam instance. > >> +- clocks : list of clock specifiers, corresponding to entries in > >> + clock-names property. > >> +- clock-names : must contain an "lp" entry, matching entries in the > >> + clocks property. > >> + > >> +Unicam supports a single port node. It should contain one 'port' child node > >> +with child 'endpoint' node. Please refer to the bindings defined in > >> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt. > >> + > >> +Within the endpoint node the "remote-endpoint" and "data-lanes" properties > >> +are mandatory. > >> +Data lane reordering is not supported so the data lanes must be in order, > >> +starting at 1. The number of data lanes should represent the number of > >> +usable lanes for the hardware block. That may be limited by either the SoC or > >> +how the platform presents the interface, and the lower value must be used. > >> + > >> +Lane reordering is not supported on the clock lane either, so the optional > >> +property "clock-lane" will implicitly be <0>. > >> +Similarly lane inversion is not supported, therefore "lane-polarities" will > >> +implicitly be <0 0 0 0 0>. > >> +Neither of these values will be checked. > >> + > >> +Example: > >> + csi1: csi1@7e801000 { > >> + compatible = "brcm,bcm2835-unicam"; > >> + reg = <0x7e801000 0x800>, > >> + <0x7e802004 0x4>; > > > > sorry, i didn't noticed this before. I'm afraid this is using a small range of the CMI. Are there possible other users of this range? Does it make sense to handle this by a separate clock driver? > > CMI (Clock Manager Image) consists of a total of 4 registers. > 0x7e802000 is CMI_CAM0, with only bits 0-5 used for gating and > inversion of the clock and data lanes (2 data lanes available on > CAM0). > 0x7e802004 is CMI_CAM1, with only bits 0-9 used for gating and > inversion of the clock and data lanes (4 data lanes available on > CAM1). > 0x7e802008 is CMI_CAMTEST which I have no documentation or drivers for. > 0x7e802010 is CMI_USBCTL. Only bit 6 is documented and is a reset. The > default value is the required value. Nothing touches it that I can > find. > > The range listed only covers the one register associated with that > Unicam instance, so no other users. The other two aren't touched. > Do 16 active register bits solely for camera clock gating really > warrant a full clock driver? You should describe all the registers in DT, not just what the driver (currently) uses. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html