On 07/06/2017 08:43 AM, Zhi Mao wrote:
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 14:16 +0800, Zhi Mao wrote:
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 13:09 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 06/30/2017 08:05 AM, Zhi Mao wrote:
In original code, the pwm output frequency is not correct
when set bit<3>=1 to PWMCON register.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index 5c11bc7..d08b5b3 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (clkdiv > 7)
return -EINVAL;
- mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | BIT(3) | clkdiv);
+ mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | clkdiv);
Just for clarification, BIT(15) enables old PWM mode, which ignores
CLKSEL (BIT(3)). Therefore setting BIT(3) does not have any effect and
can be discarded.
Am I correct? I took mt7623n datasheet for reference.
Regards,
Matthias
Yes, remove setting bit<3> will not take any effect.
PWMCON bit<3> is pwm source clock selecting register.
You can check the datasheet of MT7623 for details.
Regards
Zhi
Hi Mattias,
Ignore the above reply, I explain this bit<3> issue for you.
In the data sheet of MT7623:
PWMCON bit<3> is PWM source clock selecting register
0: CLK=CLKSRC
1: CLK=CLKSRC/1625
for example,
bit<3>=0, PWM clk source is 26M
bit<3>=1, PWM clk source is 16K
The frequency of PWM output will based on this clock source
if set bit<3>=1, it will cause the frequency of PWM output is not
correct. I also use the oscilloscope device to measure the output,
set bit<3>=0, the output meet expectation.
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
