On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:01:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > I feel the abstraction is wrong from the beginning. Ideally, we should > > have something like below. > > > > - imx6ul-isiot.dtsi > > - imx6ul-isiot-kit.dts and imx6ul-isiot-carrier.dts > > > > The -isiot should have everything on SoM and common stuff between -kit > > and -carrier boards, while -kit and -carrier include -isiot and contains > > the base-board specific things. The -isiot can have both emmc and nand > > devices with "disabled" status, and let firmware turn device on per SoM > > it boots. In that case, the abstraction level can be less and clearer. > > > > Thoughts? > > So,even the common stuff (lcdif, ts and etc) should be in -isiot.dtsi Yes, anything common can be in -isiot.dtsi. > and make it "disabled" and let them enabled on respective dts. this > what you mentioned here? It doesn't matter. If the lcd/touch is same on -kit and -carrier, you can even have them enabled by default in -isiot.dtsi. The -kit.dts and -carrier.dts are there to accommodate base-board specific differences. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
