According to the binding documentation and the source code the vf610-gpio controller takes IRQ_TYPE_* as its flags values, not GPIO_ACTIVE_*. This patch uses the right variable type which yields the same result when compiled. Note that this might be wrong and actually IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW is intended by the dt author. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello, can somebody with the hardware or it's documentation please check which flag is the right one? Best regards Uwe arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri-eval-v3.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri-eval-v3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri-eval-v3.dtsi index 091b738041a0..3e0c84d79c43 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri-eval-v3.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri-eval-v3.dtsi @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ clocks = <&clk16m>; spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>; - interrupts = <11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + interrupts = <11 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; }; }; -- 2.11.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html