On 01/08/2014 01:09 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:50:35AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 01/08/2014 06:39 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 12/24/2013 06:32 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >>> [...] >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi >>>> >>>>> + efuse@7000F800 { >>>> >>>> "fuse" might be a better node name; "efuse" is presumably the name of >>>> the instance, not the type of object. >>> >>> There's another occurrence I noticed recently where we haven't followed >>> that rule. The PMIC node on Venice2 for instance is called as3722. >>> Perhaps that should also be renamed. >> >> Yes, we should fix that. Care to send a patch? > > Ugh... I've just been going through some of the other DTS files and see > that quite a lot of other places aren't following this rule either. The ... > Perhaps it isn't worth fixing them all up after all? I guess that just means the patch will be a little bigger; it doesn't seem like that's a good reason not to fix the issue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html