Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 13:54:32 Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-01-08 10:04:57)
> > On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 09:59:39 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Lee Jones (2014-01-08 09:15:44)
> > > > > I believe Lee has already applied this one, but in future, to avoid such
> > > > > confusion, if it's more convenient for you, I can send you any clock
> > > > > series as pull requests.
> > > > 
> > > > Me? I haven't applied any clk patches.
> > > 
> > > I have taken patches 1-7 into clk-next just now.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > > I can take patch #8 as
> > > well but it would probably be better to send it through arm-soc?
> > 
> > Hmm, patch 8 is trivial enough to not cause any merge conflicts, but since
> > it's unlikely that any users depending on introduced changes will show up
> > for 3.14 it shouldn't really matter which tree it goes through...
> 
> In the absence of any strong opinion on the topic I have taken patch #8
> into clk-next for 3.14.

Great, thanks.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux