On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/24/2013 06:32 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi
>
> > + efuse@7000F800 {
>
> "fuse" might be a better node name; "efuse" is presumably the name of
> the instance, not the type of object.
There's another occurrence I noticed recently where we haven't followed
that rule. The PMIC node on Venice2 for instance is called as3722.
Perhaps that should also be renamed.
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpCi26ySsj0h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
