On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:51:52PM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote: > It currently seems to work how I expect but from your statement it's > not clear if it's entirely intentional. The current behaviour of bypassed regulators is intentional. > > > Or should a bypassed regulator ignore all other requests? One of the > > > behaviors that this patch series relies on is that calling set_voltage > > > on a bypassed regulator propagates this request to the supply and picks > > > the minimum voltage there. An alternative implementation would be to > > Yes, the expectation is that if anything is being changed it won't have > > any effect until regulation is reenabled but we're not particularly > > expecting much activity on bypassed regulators. > OK, so it is up to consumers to ensure the supply voltage is acceptable > before allowing bypass. If they want to do something clever they should > register as a consumer to the supply as well. No, that's not expected either - one or the other is fine but both isn't expected. What you're looking for here is something logically different to bypass even if the hardware implementation ends up the same.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
