Re: [PATCH v4 19/23] drivers/fsi: Add GPIO based FSI master

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On 4/4/17 5:19 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Bostic wrote:
Agreed that there is room for improvement.   I intend to look further
into your suggestions from here and our private conversation on the
matter and make changes as appropriate.  I have an open issue to track
this.  As it exists in this patch reads/writes from master to slave
fundamentally work.
My understanding is they "seem to work if you get lucky with the timing
and fall apart under load". Or did I hear wrong ?

  Given the pervasiveness and time to fully evaluate
and test any protocol updates I intend address this in the near future
with a separate follow on patch.
Please try the simple change I proposed in my email. It's a 4 or 5
lines change max to your clock_toggle function and how it's called in
send and receive. It should be trivial to check if things still "seem
to work" to begin with.

Do you have some kind of test mechanism that hammers the FSI
continuously ? Such as doing a series of putmemproc/getmemproc &
checking the values ?

Then you can run that while hammering the LPC bus and generally putting
the BMC under load and you'll quickly see if it's reliable or not.

Hi Ben,

I do now have a mechanism that puts the bus under heavy load. I'll look into your changes tomorrow.

Thanks,
Chris

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux