On 28/03/17 16:32, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 28/03/17 15:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 28/03/17 12:48, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Add the CPU and PSCI nodes for the NVIDIA Tegra210 platforms so that
>>> all CPUs can be enabled on boot. This assumes that the PSCI firmware
>>> has been loaded during the initial bootstrap on the device before the
>>> kernel starts (which is typically the case for these platforms). The
>>> PSCI firmware version is set to v0.2 which aligns with the current
>>> shipping version for Tegra.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2530.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi
>>> index 906fb836d241..de1696c28140 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi
>>> @@ -296,6 +296,29 @@
>>> };
>>> };
>>>
>>> + cpus {
>>> + cpu@0 {
>>> + enable-method = "psci";
>>
>> Is some firmware expected to populate other required properties ?
>>
>> If yes, why not populate everything in the firmware ?
>>
>> If no, how does it even boot secondaries without the "reg" property
>> that usually contains MPIDR.
>
> Please see 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi' which has these
> fields. So far we have been populating the psci information at the board
> level and so I have kept with that here and so the above is just the
> delta. Maybe the $subject could be a little clearer!
Sorry for the noise, I traversed files/headers upwards and missed
the innermost tegra210.dtsi :(
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
