On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:19:38PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: > Instead of requiring the hsspi clock to have a rate, allow using a second > clock for providing the Hz rate, which is probably more correct anyway. I'm sorry but I just can't follow the logic here at all - why would we use "a second clock" to get the rate of a clock and why would that be more correct? There's a few steps in the reasoning missing here I think!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
